Ban the Box, Criminal Records, and Racial Discrimination: A Field Experiment
Some argue Ban the Box policies are harmful to Black men: prior to BTB, white applicants were 7% more likely than comparable Black applicants to receive a callback; after BTB was implemented, that gap grew to 43%. This audit study of employer hiring practices used 15,000 fake online applications to analyze the racial impacts of Ban the Box policies in New Jersey and New York. The authors also analyzed employer considerations of education level, which is more strongly correlated with criminal record than race. This analysis indicated that the discrimination against Black applicants is based on racial stereotypes, not statistical correlations with criminal records. In other words, this study affirms what other studies have found: employers unfairly associate Blackness with criminality.
Agan, A., & Starr, S. (2018). Ban the Box, Criminal Records, and Racial Discrimination: A Field Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx028
OR
Open Access Source: https://booksc.org/book/66130735/86747b
Recent Posts
See AllBanning the Box but Keeping the Discrimination?: Disparate Impact and Employers’ Overreliance on....
How can advocates use Title VII disparate impact litigation and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to move more effectively towards ending employment discrimination against people with cr
Ban the Box policies do not increase statistical discrimination towards Black men. Contrary to other recent studies, this analysis indicates BTB policies increase the likelihood of employment for form
Ban the Box laws are helpful for reducing discrimination against people with criminal records as a whole, while also working towards ending racial discrimination. Because recent research shows that