Need Not Apply: The Racial Disparate Impact of Pre-Employment Criminal Background Checks
The Fair Credit Reporting Act should be amended to prohibit the general use of criminal background checks in the hiring process due to the significant racial and economic disparities in employment exacerbated by the practice of criminal background checks. This article uses previous court decisions such as Griggs v Duke Power Co. (and others like it that have influenced Title VII employment protections) to debunk the myth that someone who has a criminal record is a 'riskier' hire, either in terms of work performance or likelihood of committing a crime. The author argues that, because of this lack of risk, there is no general need to run criminal background checks.
Concepcion, Jr., R. (2012). Need Not Apply: The Racial Disparate Impact of Pre-Employment Criminal Background Checks. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, XIX(2), 231–253. https://racism.org/index.php?option=com_%20content&view=article&id=1366:pre-employment&catid=51&Itemid=174
Recent Posts
See AllHow can advocates use Title VII disparate impact litigation and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to move more effectively towards ending employment discrimination against people with cr
Ban the Box policies do not increase statistical discrimination towards Black men. Contrary to other recent studies, this analysis indicates BTB policies increase the likelihood of employment for form
Ban the Box laws are helpful for reducing discrimination against people with criminal records as a whole, while also working towards ending racial discrimination. Because recent research shows that