Redeemed Compared to Whom?
Using 'time since last conviction' standards to assess a person's likelihood of reoffending holds everyone, including applicants without criminal records, to too high a standard. Using data on hiring in healthcare jobs, the authors critique reliance studies that point to a specific time frame when someone with a criminal record is no longer considered a 'risky hire'. They argue that employers should evaluate their own 'risk threshold' and utilize some other type of risk assessment to apply that threshold to all applicants, given that no one - not even people without criminal records - has a 0% risk factor.
DeWitt, S. E., Bushway, S. D., Siwach, G., & Kurlychek, M. C. (2017). Redeemed Compared to Whom? Criminology & Public Policy, 16(3), 963–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12309
Open Access Source: https://booksc.org/book/66711064/fd8dbe
Recent PostsSee All
Criminal justice professionals rely less on risk assessments than is presumed. This article uses qualitative research with parole agents in California to better understand how risk is assessed and def
A focus on competency would do much more to protect the public from malpractice than removing a physician's license for behavior in their personal lives - such as a criminal conviction - that has li
Adolescent criminal activity is not a predictor of counterproductive work behaviors. By following a cohort of young people in New Zealand from childhood to age 26, the study also found that in some