Individualizing Risk: Moral Judgement, Professional Knowledge and Affect in Parole Evaluations
Criminal justice professionals rely less on risk assessments than is presumed. This article uses qualitative research with parole agents in California to better understand how risk is assessed and defined for people with criminal records. The author found that parole agents rely on three types of information: the criminal history record, the formal risk assessment, and their own judgement based on interactions with the person on parole. However, contrary to the belief that risk assessments are the prioritized form of information, the study found that most parole agents favor their personal judgement when assessing a person's risk level.
Werth, R. (2017). Individualizing Risk: Moral Judgement, Professional Knowledge and Affect in Parole Evaluations. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(4), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw025
Open Access Source: https://booksc.org/book/52603912/17f3f3
Recent PostsSee All
A focus on competency would do much more to protect the public from malpractice than removing a physician's license for behavior in their personal lives - such as a criminal conviction - that has li
Adolescent criminal activity is not a predictor of counterproductive work behaviors. By following a cohort of young people in New Zealand from childhood to age 26, the study also found that in some
'Good moral character’ requirements for occupational licensing and immigration are both arbitrary and poorly applied. Utilizing psychological research on the determinants of behavior, legal scholar De